This page (revision-50) was last changed on 2021-03-29 07:49 by Murray Altheim

This page was created on 2020-07-06 05:48 by Murray Altheim

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
50 2021-03-29 07:49 14 KB Murray Altheim to previous
49 2021-03-29 07:48 15 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
48 2021-03-29 07:10 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
47 2021-03-29 07:08 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
46 2021-03-29 07:07 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
45 2020-07-21 09:23 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
44 2020-07-21 09:20 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
43 2020-07-15 10:23 17 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
42 2020-07-13 10:43 16 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
41 2020-07-13 09:40 16 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
Microbit
Microbit

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 32 changed one line
Which of the many robotic [microcomputer/microcontroller|microcontroller] platforms ([Raspberry Pi], [Arduino], [micro:bit|microbit], etc.), which of the various programming environments (graphical, [Python], MicroPython, C++, assembly language), and then which specific robot to choose has as much to do with a sense of one's requirements as which robot is most appealing to the eye. There's also the question as to whether to purchase a ready-made robot, a kit, or design-your-own from either an existing system or a bespoke robot from available parts (truly "on your own"). And also whether to purchase something that grows with one's experience or is limited to the specifics of the chosen robot. Having the flexibility of multiple programming environments is a factor in any robot's favour.
Choosing which of the many robotic [microcomputer/microcontroller|microcontroller] platforms ([Raspberry Pi], [Arduino], [micro:bit|microbit], etc.), which of the various programming environments (graphical, [Python], MicroPython, C++, assembly language), and then which specific robot has as much to do with a sense of one's goals and requirements as with which robot is most appealing to the eye. There's also the question as to whether to purchase a ready-made robot, a kit, or design-your-own from either an existing system or an entirely bespoke robot from available parts (truly "on your own"). And also whether to purchase something that grows with one's experience or is limited to the specifics of the chosen robot. Having the flexibility of multiple programming environments is a factor in any robot's favour.
At line 34 changed one line
How old does someone have to be to use a micro:bit? That's not an easy question to answer, but "age level" is not so much a factor since it's pretty clear that a 10 year old and a 70 year old may share the same level of previous experience, interest, and ingenuity. Success is more about enthusiasm, curiosity, and how much time one devotes to learning than anything else.
That's a lot to think about.
At line 36 added 2 lines
The [mini-Zumo robots|Zumo Robot] are appealing if competition within a group is a requirement. These are generally Arduino-based, so they'd be programmed in C++. But very popular but they're somewhat limited beyond line following and knocking each other out of the ring.
At line 38 removed 2 lines
The [mini-Zumo robots|Zumo Robot] are appealing if competition within a group is a requirement. These are generally Arduino-based, so they'd be programmed in C++. But they're pretty limited beyond line following and knocking each other out of the ring.
At line 42 added 2 lines
Among the many micro:bit based robots the major factors were: durability, expandability, features-vs-cost, and lastly, aesthetics. While appearance may be considered important to children, my guess is that it's the ''parents'' who believe that cuteness counts. It probably does for the first ten minutes. After the cuteness wears off a child probably wants a robot that is something they can learn with and be intrigued by, one with a bit of depth. A Lego kit that can only be built one way is less interesting over the long haul than a set of Lego blocks that can continue to spur the imagination over many years.
At line 44 changed one line
Among the many micro:bit based robots the major factors were: durability, expandability, features-vs-cost, and lastly, aesthetics. While appearance may be considered important to children, my guess is that it's the ''parents'' who believe that cuteness counts. It probably does for the first ten minutes. After the cuteness wears off a child probably wants a robot that is something they can learn with and be intrigued by, one with a bit of depth. A Lego kit that can only be built one way is less interesting over the long haul than a set of Lego blocks that can continue to spur the imagination over many years.
How old does someone have to be to use a micro:bit? That's not an easy question to answer, but "age level" is not so much a factor since it's pretty clear that a 10 year old and a 70 year old may share the same level of previous experience, interest, and ingenuity. Success is more about enthusiasm, curiosity, and how much time one devotes to learning than anything else.
This page (revision-50) was last changed on 2021-03-29 07:49 by Murray AltheimTop