This page (revision-55) was last changed on 2024-05-30 22:30 by Murray Altheim

This page was created on 2021-03-29 18:18 by Murray Altheim

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
55 2024-05-30 22:30 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous
54 2021-10-02 05:56 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
53 2021-10-02 05:54 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
52 2021-05-27 04:47 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
51 2021-05-16 07:55 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
50 2021-05-16 07:31 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
49 2021-05-16 06:23 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
48 2021-04-19 11:21 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
47 2021-04-10 12:46 20 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
46 2021-04-10 12:43 19 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
45 2021-04-10 12:37 19 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
44 2021-04-10 12:35 19 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
43 2021-04-10 12:31 18 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
42 2021-04-10 12:29 18 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last
41 2021-04-10 12:26 18 KB Murray Altheim to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 58 changed one line
One thing that __almost__ goes without saying: the vast majority of the hobbyist Mars Rovers I've found are, despite being very complicated and often expensive mechanisms, they are almost without fail toys, [remote-controlled vehicles|RemoteControlledVehicle], and only rarely qualify as __[Telerobotics]__. Very few have operational sensors, and so far (I'm trying to think...) none of them I've seen are __autonomous robots__, or even semi-autonomous. Put it this way, if you've built an autonomous Mars rover, contact me and I'll put a link or a description or a page up about it.
One thing that __almost__ goes without saying: the vast majority of the hobbyist Mars Rovers I've found are, despite being very complicated and often expensive mechanisms, they are almost without fail toys, remote-controlled vehicles, and only rarely qualify as __telerobotics__. Very few have operational sensors, and so far (I'm trying to think...) none of them are __autonomous robots__, or even semi-autonomous. Put it this way, if you've built an autonomous Mars rover, contact me and I'll put a link or a description or a page up about it.
At line 61 changed one line
So far I've been scanning the cool robot parts at [ServoCity|https://www.servocity.com/motion/] for ideas for the [steering] mechanism and rocker arms. The scale and weight of the overall robot help decide the size/power of the motors and servos. It's a bit of a balancing act. I also want to, unlike most of the "civilian" designs, somehow tuck my motors inside the wheels or otherwise not have them hanging down near the ground as many/most of the rovers I've seen seem to do.
So far I've been scanning the cool robot parts at [ServoCity|https://www.servocity.com/motion/] for ideas for the steering mechanism and rocker arms. The scale and weight of the overall robot help decide the size/power of the motors and servos. It's a bit of a balancing act. I also want to, unlike most of the "civilian" designs, somehow tuck my motors inside the wheels or otherwise not have them hanging down near the ground as many/most of the rovers I've seen seem to do.
At line 153 changed one line
| 2 | 12V max CXT® Power Source w/ USB port (YL00000003) | $95.00 | $190.00 | | Toolshed Petone | [https://www.makitatools.com/products/details/YL00000003]
| 2 | 12V max CXT® Power Source w/ USB port (YL000000003) | $95.00 | $190.00 | | Toolshed Petone | [https://www.makitatools.com/products/details/YL00000003]
At line 168 removed one line
** [Rover Telecommunications Photo Gallery|https://mars.nasa.gov/MPF/rovercom/pix.html]